Even then, you generally don't receive a lot of solid answers.
You tend to have to research your possible destinations through bland text write-ups, or to search around in the documentation in the menus to find out why the king of Swadia is attacking the khanate of Kergit. The backdrop is always busy with various wars, villages being looted, and castles being besieged, although you feel more like a hapless spectator than a wannabe hero with anything at stake during all of this conflict.
There is something positive to be said for wide-open RPGs that leave the storytelling up to you, but this game is so incomplete that it'll feel as if you're being asked to script a heroic saga without the benefit of pen and paper. Unfortunately, this derring-do is only one part of a cheaply stitched-together, single-player-only role-playing game that replaces plot with a sandbox world that leaves you without a clue of what to do or where to go. TaleWorlds Entertainment has come up with one of the most innovative and user-friendly re-creations of combat ever seen in a first/third-person RPG, with exciting battles on foot, mounted on horseback, and at the head of a private army. If all you had to do was fight, Mount & Blade might have been a winner. It's a decent 2 pager, so here are a few choice quotes: They take it to task for boring quests, lack of RPG structure, poor graphics (what, even after all those improvements?) and a lot of little bugs and oddities. GameSpot have dished the dirt on Mount & Blade and it's not pretty.
0 kommentar(er)
